Why Security Guards Are Still Walking Out the Door in 2026
(And What Actually Gets Them to Stay)

The Trackforce Team

Trackforce

September 22, 2026 · 15 min read

Security guard leaving a post, illustrating guard turnover in 2026

If you’re running a security operation, you already know the guard you hired six months ago probably isn’t the guard covering that shift today. The industry’s turnover problem hasn’t leveled off. It’s gotten worse.

A UC Berkeley Labor Center report found annual turnover in the U.S. security services industry hit 88.6% in 2024, compared with 66% across the private sector overall. ASIS International puts industry-wide turnover at 77% for the same year, and some contract security firms report rates as high as 300%, meaning they’re replacing their entire guard force three times over in a single year. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects essentially flat employment growth for security guards through 2034, yet the industry still generates roughly 162,300 job openings a year. That gap tells you everything: this isn’t a hiring problem. It’s a retention problem, and it’s expensive.

Key takeaways

  • Guard turnover is a retention problem, not a hiring problem.
    Security services turnover hit 88.6% in 2024, compared with 66% across the private sector, while the BLS projects essentially flat job growth through 2034.
  • Every departure costs more than the recruiting line item.
    Overtime to cover open posts, SLA penalties and strained client relationships push the true cost of turnover far past hiring spend.
  • Pay matters most, but it is not the only lever.
    Higher wages cut guard turnover at SFO from 94.7% to 18.7%, and signing bonuses, tenure raises, flexible scheduling and mental health support all move the numbers too.
  • Guards signal they are leaving long before they resign.
    Rising callouts, overtime overload and denied schedule requests show up in your workforce data weeks before a resignation letter does.
  • TrackTik turns those signals into action.
    Scheduling, attendance, overtime and field data live in one platform, so managers can step in while a good guard is still worth keeping. Guardian Protection Force credits that visibility in part for its 80% retention rate.

The cost adds up fast

Every guard who walks takes recruiting spend, background checks, drug testing, uniforms, and training hours with them. Add in the overtime you’re paying current guards to cover the gap, the SLA penalties when coverage slips, and the client relationships strained by a rotating cast of unfamiliar faces, and the true cost of turnover runs well past the recruiting line item on a budget.

The guards themselves aren’t leaving for one reason. Pay tops the list, especially in high-cost markets where entry-level security wages haven’t kept pace with hospitality, retail, or gig work. But engagement matters too. Guards in low-stimulation posts disengage. Guards who face hostile public interactions without support burn out. Guards who get minimal training feel unprepared and look for employers who invest in them. While none of this is new, what’s changed is how much leverage guards now have to act on it.

What goes into the cost of one departure

Most firms only track the hiring spend. The full picture looks more like this:

Cost areaWhat it includes
RecruitingJob board spend, recruiter or hiring manager time, and interview hours
ScreeningBackground checks, drug testing, and license or permit fees
Onboarding and trainingUniforms, equipment, classroom and on-site training hours, and supervisor shadowing time
Coverage gapsOvertime paid to current guards, premium rates for last-minute fill-ins, and shifts that go unfilled
Client impactSLA penalties, service credits, and the time it takes to rebuild trust when unfamiliar faces keep showing up on site
Lost productivityThe weeks a new guard needs to learn post orders, site layout, and client expectations

A quick way to estimate your own turnover cost

Add up what it costs to recruit, screen, equip, and train one guard, then add the overtime you pay to cover the post while it sits open. Multiply that figure by the number of guards who left in the last 12 months.

As an illustration, a firm with 250 guards running at 90% turnover replaces about 225 people a year. At $3,500 per replacement, that is close to $790,000 a year, before a single SLA penalty. Your numbers will differ, but most firms find the total is larger than any single line in their budget suggests. If overtime is where the cost hides for you, TrackTik Margin Insight flags it before it crosses the line, while the pay period is still open.

Proof that intervention works: the SFO example

Skeptical that wage increases actually move the needle? San Francisco International Airport raised security guard wages from $6.45 to $10 an hour and watched turnover drop from 94.7% to 18.7%. This documented before-and-after at a single site is one of the clearest data points available showing that retention responds directly to compensation decisions.

Raising wages across the board isn’t realistic for every firm’s margins, though. That’s where secondary levers come in: signing bonuses, tenure-based raises, better benefits, commuter passes, and flexible scheduling all show up in retention data as meaningful, even when a full wage overhaul isn’t on the table.

What’s changed since the old playbook

A handful of newer strategies are gaining real traction in 2026, beyond the standard compensation and culture advice.

  • Predictive retention over exit interviews. By the time a guard sits down for an exit interview, the opportunity to keep them is already gone. Firms are starting to use scheduling data, attendance patterns, and overtime load to flag guards who show early signs of disengagement, so managers can step in before a resignation letter shows up.
  • Wage transparency as a retention tool, not just a recruiting one. Guards can check ZipRecruiter and BLS wage data as easily as employers can. Firms that post honest, competitive pay ranges upfront are seeing less early-tenure attrition, because guards aren’t discovering three months in that they’re underpaid relative to the market.
  • Scheduling control that mirrors gig work. When guards compare security jobs to rideshare or delivery work, they’re not only comparing pay. They’re comparing how much say they have over their own hours. Self-service shift swaps and choice-based post assignments are proving to be a retention lever in their own right, separate from what’s on the paycheck.
  • Mental health support without stigma attached. Security guards regularly deal with hostile or upsetting interactions as part of the job. Firms that offer counseling and stress management, and actively work to remove the stigma around using them, are seeing guards stay longer and burn out less.

Why security guards quit: the warning signs to watch

Guards rarely resign out of nowhere. The signals usually show up in scheduling, attendance, and field data weeks before the notice does. The problem is that those signals are scattered across spreadsheets, timesheets, and supervisor memory, so nobody connects them in time. These are the patterns worth watching, and where each one surfaces in TrackTik.

Warning signWhat it often meansWhere TrackTik surfaces it
More callouts, late clock-ins, or no-showsDisengagement, burnout, or a second job competing for their timeAttendance tracking in TrackTik People Management
The same guards absorbing most of the overtimeFatigue that turns into resignations, usually among your most reliable peopleOvertime alerts in Margin Insight and trends in Business Intelligence
Shift swap or time-off requests that keep getting deniedA guard whose life no longer fits the schedule they were givenLeave management and vacant shift broadcasting in Business Administration
Missed checkpoints or thinner daily reportsA guard who has mentally checked out on postTour and report data in the Security Guard Tour System
Licenses or certifications left to lapseNo plans to be in the industry, or at your firm, next yearCertification tracking in People Management
Months on the same quiet, low-stimulation postBoredom that slowly becomes disengagementScheduling and post assignment history in People Management

One signal on its own may not mean much. Two or three together on the same guard usually mean it is time for a conversation. A simple weekly routine works: review the guards with the most callouts and the heaviest overtime, and have a supervisor check in with each of them before the next schedule is published.

Why the first 90 days decide whether a guard stays

Early tenure is where retention is won or lost. A new guard who feels unprepared, lands on a difficult post without context, or never hears from a supervisor is the person on your roster most likely to leave. A simple, repeatable first 90 days changes that.

  1. Before day one. Finish onboarding paperwork, license checks, and certifications digitally, so the first shift is about the job instead of forms. In TrackTik, onboarding, certifications, and scheduling sit in one record for every guard.
  2. First week. Pair each new guard with an experienced officer for at least one shadow shift, and put post orders and site instructions on their phone with TrackTik Guard Management.
  3. Day 30. Hold a short check-in. Ask what is working, what is confusing, and whether the schedule fits their life. Adjust before frustration builds.
  4. Day 60. Recognize good work with specifics, like a clean tour record or a well-written incident report, and offer a second post or cross-training to keep the work varied.
  5. Day 90. Talk about the future: the next pay step, certifications worth earning, and what a path to supervisor looks like. Guards who can see a next step are far more likely to take it with you.

Retention metrics worth tracking every month

You cannot fix what you do not measure, and annual turnover alone tells you too late. These six measures, reviewed monthly by site and supervisor, show where retention is slipping while there is still time to act.

MetricHow to calculate itWhy it matters
Annual turnover rateGuards who left in the last 12 months divided by average headcount, times 100Your baseline, and the number clients and benchmarks compare
90-day attritionNew hires who left within 90 days divided by new hires in the periodShows whether hiring and onboarding are setting guards up to stay
Callout rateCallouts and no-shows divided by scheduled shiftsAn early sign of disengagement at a site or under a supervisor
Overtime concentrationShare of all overtime hours worked by your top 10% of guardsReveals burnout risk among your most reliable people
Time to fill an open shiftAverage time from a shift opening to a confirmed replacementLong fills push overtime onto the guards who stay
Turnover by site and supervisorAnnual turnover calculated separately for each site and supervisorPinpoints where the problem is local rather than company-wide

Most of these can be pulled from attendance, scheduling and overtime data you already capture. TrackTik Business Intelligence puts them on one dashboard, so a site with rising callouts or a supervisor with unusually high turnover stands out before the next resignation, not after it.

Where technology fits into the picture

None of these strategies require guesswork if you have the right visibility into your workforce. Security workforce management platforms like TrackTik automate scheduling, payroll, and billing so managers spend less time on manual follow-ups and more time on the things that actually affect retention: training, recognition, and one-on-one conversations with guards about where they want their career to go.

Real-time data on guard scheduling, overtime costs, and client service performance also means problems surface while they’re still fixable, not after a guard has already checked out mentally or handed in notice. And when guards can manage their own schedules, access timesheets, and view paystubs in one place, it removes a lot of the friction and confusion that quietly erodes job satisfaction over time.

Guardian Protection Force Inc. is a strong example of what this looks like in practice.

Guardian Protection Force logo

80%

Employee retention rate

“We’re maintaining an impressive 80% employee retention rate, thanks in part to enhanced insights into workforce trends that TrackTik offers.”

Headshot of Ashlee Cervantes

Ashlee Cervantes, CEO
Guardian Protection Force Inc.

In-house security teams feel turnover too

Turnover is not only a contract security problem. Corporate and in-house security teams feel it in two places: in their own officer ranks, and in the guard vendors they rely on to staff their sites. When a vendor’s guard force turns over every few months, the result is inconsistent post coverage, officers who do not know the site, and incident reports that vary in quality from one shift to the next.

Enterprise security leaders can apply the same playbook. Ask vendors to share retention and coverage data in every business review, and run in-house and vendor officers on one platform so performance is measured the same way everywhere. That is how enterprise security teams use TrackTik to standardize every site and vendor.

Where to go from here

Turnover in this industry isn’t going to fix itself, and the data suggests it’s trending in the wrong direction, not the right one. The firms pulling ahead are combining the fundamentals (competitive pay, real training, a workplace where guards feel heard) with better visibility into their own workforce data, so they can act before a good guard is already gone.

For a full breakdown of the root causes behind guard turnover and a step-by-step approach to building a retention strategy that works, download The Ultimate Guide to Retaining Your Security Guards.

Cover of the Ultimate Guide to Retaining Your Security Guards

Free download

Get your copy of the guard retention guide

Frequently Asked Questions

Security guard retention lags behind most industries because the job combines low starting wages with high-stress demands: hostile public interactions, night and weekend shifts, and long stretches of low-stimulation work. Guards who can find comparable or better pay in hospitality, retail, or gig work often do, which keeps turnover well above the cross-industry average.

Given that industry-wide turnover regularly runs between 50% and 90% annually, and some contract firms see rates as high as 300%, a retention rate in the 75-85% range is strong. Firms using workforce data to catch disengagement early, rather than relying on exit interviews, tend to land in that range.

Yes, and the effect can be dramatic. When San Francisco International Airport raised security guard wages from $6.45 to $10 an hour, turnover dropped from 94.7% to 18.7%. Pay isn’t the only lever, but it’s consistently the one with the clearest, most measurable impact.

Every guard who leaves adds to the hiring workload: sourcing, background checks, drug testing, and onboarding all have to happen again, often for the same open post. Firms stuck in high-turnover cycles end up spending most of their hiring capacity on replacement rather than growth, which makes it harder to staff new contracts or scale up.

Signing bonuses, tenure-based raises, flexible scheduling, and choice-based post assignments all show measurable retention gains even when a full wage increase isn’t feasible. Investing in training and clear paths to promotion also matters. Guards who see a future with a firm are less likely to leave for a marginally higher hourly rate elsewhere.

Workforce management platforms like TrackTik give managers visibility into scheduling, overtime, and attendance patterns that often signal disengagement before a guard resigns. That data lets firms intervene earlier, and features like self-service scheduling and easy access to pay and timesheets remove the everyday friction that quietly drives guards to look elsewhere.

Beyond experience and certifications, hiring managers get better retention outcomes when they screen for fit with specific post types (foot patrol versus guard booth, solo work versus team-based roles) and are upfront about pay, schedule, and growth opportunities during the interview. Mismatched expectations at hiring are one of the most common, and most avoidable, drivers of early turnover.

The most reliable signals show up in workforce data before a resignation: more callouts and late clock-ins, the same guards absorbing most of the overtime, repeated shift swap or time-off requests that get denied, missed tour checkpoints, and certifications left to lapse. One sign on its own may mean little, but two or three together on the same guard usually mean it is time for a supervisor check-in. TrackTik brings attendance, scheduling, overtime, and patrol data into one place so those patterns are visible early.

TrackTik, the security workforce management platform from Trackforce, connects the data and daily workflows that shape a guard’s experience. People Management keeps onboarding, certifications, scheduling, leave, and attendance in one record. Guard Management puts post orders and support in every officer’s pocket. Margin Insight flags overtime before it burns out your best people, and Business Intelligence shows retention risk across every site. Guardian Protection Force credits that visibility in part for its 80% employee retention rate.

Related resources

More on keeping good guards